<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>- Fluid&#039;Advance - by Brieuc Saffré &#187; user</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fluid-advance.com/tag/user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fluid-advance.com</link>
	<description>Web, Advertising, Photo... by Brieuc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>User Generated Content: why brands must deal with it now</title>
		<link>http://www.fluid-advance.com/2009/09/user-generated-content-why-brands-must-deal-with-it-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fluid-advance.com/2009/09/user-generated-content-why-brands-must-deal-with-it-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brieuc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flamby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nestlé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UGC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluid-advance.com/?p=876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here I am ! I am back in France 2 weeks ago. I won&#8217;t stop to blog of course but I will try to write my posts in English or in French, it will depend on the subject and the time I will have. I just updated my WordPress version to the last one and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fluid-advance.com/2009/09/user-generated-content-why-brands-must-deal-with-it-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Facebook shouldn&#8217;t look as much on Twitter&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.fluid-advance.com/2009/03/why-facebook-shouldnt-look-as-much-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fluid-advance.com/2009/03/why-facebook-shouldnt-look-as-much-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brieuc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fluid-advance.com/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several weeks ago, Facebook made some changes on its way of working. This time, I must notice that change management was better dealt than with the terms of use. However, once again, the users do not like the changes. After having tried to buy Twitter, (several offers around $ 500M in cash or Facebook participation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fluid-advance.com/2009/03/why-facebook-shouldnt-look-as-much-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

